Facing a DBS barring notice at the same time as a fitness to practise investigation can be overwhelming for any healthcare professional. Both processes have the power to end your career and severely damage your reputation. However, with the right legal knowledge and strategic approach, you can present a robust defence that addresses both sets of risks effectively. This guide explains the key legal principles and practical steps to help you navigate both proceedings with confidence.
DBS vs. Regulator: Understanding the Different Powers
The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) decides whether you should be barred from “regulated activity” under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006. This is fundamentally about risk to the public and looks forward, not about punishing past behaviour.
Professional regulators, such as the HCPC, GMC, or NMC—focus on whether someone is fit to practise safely. Their powers are broader: they can impose suspension, practice conditions, or even striking off, and their decisions balance both past conduct and risk to the public.
Case law makes clear that DBS and regulators are independent. Even if the same incident is considered, DBS is not bound by regulatory outcomes, but must give them proper weight. The DBS reviews risk going forward, while regulators also review professional history and safety.
The Legal Test: Proportionality & Article 8 ECHR
Every barring decision must comply with the principle of proportionality, as set out in landmark cases such as Huang v SSHD and Quila. The tribunal and DBS will consider:
-
Is barring necessary to protect the public from harm?
-
Is barring the least restrictive means, or are there less intrusive options?
-
Does the outcome strike a fair balance between your individual rights and the interests of society?
The Upper Tribunal reviews proportionality in detail during appeals. Written representations must address every legal and factual element, these hearings do not just “rubber stamp” previous decisions. If the regulator has already managed risks through suspension or practice conditions, you can argue that additional DBS barring is legally excessive or unnecessary.
Key Defence Strategies
1. Respond Quickly to ‘Minded to Bar’ Notices
You only have eight weeks to make written representations. Missing this deadline will almost always lead to automatic barring, regardless of your case. You should seek legal representation so you do not prejudice your position.
2. Address Every Legal and Factual Detail
Challenge every error using documentation, references, and other evidence. Explain the context behind any incidents with clear employment history, medical records or mitigation, and the steps you’ve taken since, such as remediation or support.
3. Argue Proportionality Directly
Use legal language to show why barring is not required if your regulator already protects the public (e.g., with suspension or conditions). Highlight why less restrictive measures work.
4. Use Regulatory Proceedings Strategically
If hearings with the regulator are ongoing, tell the DBS and ask it to delay its decision until the outcome is known. If the outcome is favourable, such as conditions, restrictions, or no impairment—this strongly undermines the case for barring. The argument is simple. Another competent authority is looking at this. They have the power to impose interim and final measures if necessary.
5. Know Your Appeal Rights
Anyone barred from practice can appeal to the Upper Tribunal. The appeal reviews both facts and law, including proportionality, and can overturn the DBS’s decision.
What Evidence Strengthens Your Case?
-
Employment and character references: Especially from managers or supervisors
-
Medical or expert reports: About risk, capacity, or relevant health conditions
-
Documents showing remediation: Training, courses, therapy, or practice changes
-
Letters of support: From professional colleagues who can vouch for your safe practice
Summary for Professionals
DBS and fitness to practise investigations are separate processes. Success depends on understanding both, using the principle of proportionality, and making prompt, evidence-driven, and legally precise submissions. Early and expert legal advice is key to building a successful defence.
If you urgently need representation or strategic advice in DBS and regulatory defence, contact Regulation Resolution Solicitors who are specialist in this area.