Services for Legal Professionals
Expert defence in the following areas:
What our clients say
Why Choose Us?
With 86 years of combined experience across both defence and prosecution, we bring an insider’s perspective on regulatory processes.
We understand the stress and uncertainty regulatory challenges can cause. Our client-centred approach ensures you feel supported every step of the way.
We guarantee same-day responses, so you can be confident that your concerns will be addressed promptly.
How We Work With You
- Free Initial Review
Contact us and we’ll review your case papers, provide an honest assessment of prospects, and give you a clear picture of what lies ahead. Entirely free, entirely confidential. - Strategic Consultation
We develop a detailed strategic roadmap tailored to your case. You’ll understand the regulatory process, key risks, and exactly what to expect at each stage. - Proactive Representation
From investigation through to hearing (or appeal), we handle all communications, submissions, evidence, and advocacy. You have direct access to senior expertise whenever you need guidance. - Expert Support Throughout
We coordinate expert evidence where needed, prepare witnesses, develop written submissions, and provide full advocacy at hearings. Your interests are protected at every stage.
Recent cases Tamara prosecuted before joining Regulation Resolution
Tamara joined Regulation Resolution in October 2026 after prosecuting solicitors before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal on behalf of the SRA. She now defends solicitors.
These are recent cases she prosecuted for the SRA. They are not defence results. Her defence cases are ongoing, and we will publish those outcomes as they conclude. We share these because they show how the SRA builds a case and what the Tribunal treats as decisive.
Prosecuted for the SRA
Misleading a client – fine, dishonesty not proved
A Senior Associate was fined £15,000 for misleading a client three times about the status of an expert report. The Tribunal found breaches of Principle 7 and paragraph 1.4 of the Code of Conduct, but did not find dishonesty or lack of integrity.
Prosecuted for the SRA
Client money: falsified bank statements – struck off
A firm owner and COFA fabricated bank statements and a bank letter, including a fictitious £2.1 million balance, to conceal a shortage of client funds. All allegations were proved.
Prosecuted for the SRA
Client money: Agreed Outcome – fixed-period suspension
A sole practitioner who was COLP, COFA and MLRO admitted breaches of the Accounts Rules, the Code of Conduct and the SRA Principles. The Tribunal approved an Agreed Outcome and still imposed a suspension.
Prosecuted for the SRA
Exceptional circumstances argued – struck off
A junior solicitor admitted dishonesty in a pupillage application, including falsely claimed academic prizes. He relied on depressive illness as exceptional circumstances. The Tribunal found the dishonesty too serious to avoid strike-off.
Prosecuted for the SRA
Application to remove practice conditions – granted
A solicitor applied to lift conditions imposed in 2017 for misleading information in an indemnity insurance form. After seven years of compliance, training and insight, the Tribunal removed them.
Protect your career. Respond. Don't react.
When a fitness to practise investigation begins, the first few days and weeks are critical.
Get expert strategic advice and insider regulatory knowledge immediately.
Please call us now on 0208 088 5161 or complete our contact form here and we will be in touch to help you.
