https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js
https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js
Skip to content
A misconduct allegation is rarely as simple as “did it happen or not.” Regulators ask a layered set of questions: was there misconduct, was it serious, is your fitness to practise impaired as a result, and what does the public interest require. Answering the wrong one of those questions, however sincerely, is one of the […]
Professional Misconduct Solicitors Read More »
When your regulator opens an investigation, you are not in an ordinary legal dispute. You are inside a process with its own rules, its own thresholds, and its own idea of what the public interest requires. We are regulatory law solicitors who act exclusively for regulated professionals, and we understand that process from the inside,
Regulatory Law Solicitors Read More »
Why This Matters When facing fitness to practise proceedings before the NMC, GMC, GDC, HCPC, or any UK healthcare regulator, your written response can make or break your case. Yet healthcare professionals are increasingly using ChatGPT to draft regulatory responses – a decision that can catastrophically backfire. This article examines why AI-generated responses create serious
The Hidden Danger of Using ChatGPT for Fitness to Practise Responses Read More »
Facing a DBS barring notice at the same time as a fitness to practise investigation can be overwhelming for any healthcare professional. Both processes have the power to end your career and severely damage your reputation. However, with the right legal knowledge and strategic approach, you can present a robust defence that addresses both sets
Defending DBS Barring While Under Fitness to Practise Investigation Read More »
The recent Mazur judgment has reignited debate about the scope of the “conduct of litigation” as defined under the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007). Specifically, it has called into question who may properly undertake litigation and in what contexts. For anyone working in fitness to practise proceedings, this may prompt you to ask the question,
Are fitness to practise proceedings litigation? Read More »
Analysis of Richmond v NMC [2025] EWHC 1828 (Admin) and NMC v Persand [2023] EWHC 3356 (Admin) Introduction: Interim Orders under Judicial Scrutiny Interim orders in professional regulation are intended to protect the public while safeguarding a practitioner’s right to fair process. However, lengthy delays in regulatory proceedings can mean that these temporary measures inflict
Is the tide turning for Interim Orders in fitness to practise proceedings? Read More »
Welcome to Legal Jukebox Friday Legal Jukebox Friday is your weekly dose of lively discussions where we randomly select a legal case to explore and why it may assist those practising in regulatory law, including solicitors, adjudicators, and healthcare professionals. While some of these cases may be considered classics, they remain relevant and are worth
Legal Jukebox Friday: How Interim Orders Impact Regulatory Decisions Read More »
Scroll to Top
(function(){if(window.matchMedia('(max-width:921.99px)').matches){document.body.classList.add('ast-header-break-point');document.body.classList.remove('ast-desktop');}})();
/(trident|msie)/i.test(navigator.userAgent)&&document.getElementById&&window.addEventListener&&window.addEventListener("hashchange",function(){var t,e=location.hash.substring(1);/^[A-z0-9_-]+$/.test(e)&&(t=document.getElementById(e))&&(/^(?:a|select|input|button|textarea)$/i.test(t.tagName)||(t.tabIndex=-1),t.focus())},!1);
var astra = {"break_point":"921","isRtl":"","is_scroll_to_id":"","is_scroll_to_top":"1","is_header_footer_builder_active":"1","responsive_cart_click":"flyout","is_dark_palette":"","revealEffectEnable":"","edit_post_url":"https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-admin/post.php?post={{id}}&action=edit","ajax_url":"https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php","infinite_count":"2","infinite_total":"2","pagination":"number","infinite_scroll_event":"scroll","no_more_post_message":"No more posts to show.","grid_layout":"1","site_url":"https://regulationresolution.co.uk","blogArchiveTitleLayout":"","blogArchiveTitleOn":"","show_comments":"Show Comments","enableHistoryPushState":"1","masonryEnabled":"","blogMasonryBreakPoint":"0"};
//# sourceURL=astra-theme-js-js-extra
https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-content/themes/astra/assets/js/minified/frontend.min.js
var astraAddon = {"is_elementor_active":"","sticky_active":"1","svgIconClose":"\u003Cspan class=\"ast-icon icon-close\"\u003E\u003C/span\u003E","hf_account_show_menu_on":"hover","hf_account_action_type":"link","hf_account_logout_action":"link","header_main_stick":"1","header_above_stick":"0","header_below_stick":"0","stick_header_meta":"","header_main_stick_meta":"","header_above_stick_meta":"","header_below_stick_meta":"","sticky_header_on_devices":"both","sticky_header_style":"none","sticky_hide_on_scroll":"","break_point":"921","tablet_break_point":"921","mobile_break_point":"544","header_main_shrink":"1","header_animation_effect":"none","header_logo_width":"","responsive_header_logo_width":{"desktop":250,"tablet":"","mobile":260},"stick_origin_position":"","site_layout":"ast-full-width-layout","site_content_width":"1240","site_layout_padded_width":"1200","site_layout_box_width":"1200","header_builder_active":"1","component_limit":"10","is_header_builder_active":"1"};
//# sourceURL=astra-addon-js-js-extra
https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/astra-addon/astra-addon-6a4961be0a2ba6-39900859.js
https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/astra-addon/assets/js/minified/purify.min.js
https://regulationresolution.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/bb-plugin/cache/1873-layout.js